Rolling Stone defend their rubbish ❝Greatest Singers of All Time❞ list...

And the excuses get even more pathetic...

Rolling Stone's ridiculous justification for omitting Celine Dion from their controversial ❝200 Greatest Singers of All Time❞ list? Don't be mad at us they say, because this is a ❝singers❞ list... not a ❝voices❞ one.  

Huh? And just when I thought ❝great singer❞ and ❝great voice were both suppose to be synonymous. 

4 Comments:

Anonymous said...

Pretty much as I stated in the Celine post. With that said, I do think Michael should definitely have been included in the list.

Toya said...

He is. But they placed him at a paltry #86. Definitely deserved much higher. They put singers like Ariana Grande before him which is laughable.

Anonymous said...

Trolling Stones wanted to troll us all in 2023 & get themselves “relevant” & so far they are succeeding since people are talking about them & clickin on their article. The 2nd i opened that article & saw how low Aguilera & Clarkson were knowing Rihanna & others were on that list too, i was like “not today Satan”!
Yes Opinions are personal but this right here was made with the sole purpose to create a buzz…not giving them that energy! (The word “singers” should not have been USED here…specially if u not including Celine Dion, Toni Braxton or Lara Fabian!)

Anonymous said...

Where Madonna?